What can you do? One technique is to hide the clues better. As I’ve stressed in my other reviews, there’s nothing wrong with mysteries being solvable. The first is not to care that it’s obvious. What could contradict it? The stolen book. But how could it possibly be relevant? Only because it dates the painting. The exact date of the painting isn’t pertinent to the story, so why was it emphasised? It must be relevant later on. The gallery owner mentioned a specific date when he was talking about the painting. The downside of this is that it’s hard to sneak in clues that have no obvious relevance.
#Banacek season 3 episode 3 full
would waffle on for a full five minutes in a desperate attempt for the writers to fill the running time are, mercifully, long dead. The days when Remington Steele, Banacek, or Magnum P.I.
#Banacek season 3 episode 3 tv
Modern TV writing, especially for boring exposition, is about maximum efficiency. It’s not unusual for every character in an episode of Death in Paradise to have an alibi, but for the moment it’s suspicious that he’s the only one.īut the most important factor, which makes me almost 100% sure of my prediction, even at this early stage, is the gallery owner’s dialogue about the painting. He was the only person there when Dwayne and Fidel got the call from Carlton. Third, the gallery owner seems to have an alibi.
But since it’s still there, I guess it’s fake.) (Although my initial reaction was that the phone call was a ruse to get Fidel and Dwayne away so the painting could be stolen, which would be another way for a valuable item to feature in a mystery. So common that evening mentioning an object like that makes its provenance suspect. Second, it’s very common for valuable objects in mysteries (paintings, manuscripts, secret lost Dickens novels) to be fakes. The scenario implicates a woman therefore, by mystery thinking, the killer is a man. Specifying that the murderer has to be male or female is a red herring in 90% of cases. Possibly the gallery owner put on a voice, but maybe a better explanation will turn up.Įxplanation: First, there are some small clues which stand out from mystery experience.
#Banacek season 3 episode 3 how to
I don’t know how to explain the “She’s got a gun” phone message. He stole the book because it contains information about when the bar in the painting was founded, and it will contradict whatever he said at the beginning about the story behind the painting. Carlton noticed this, and the gallery owner noticed him notice. Prediction: The gallery owner is the murderer. Carlton’s phone is missing, along with a single book about the Caribbean. When they rush to his house they find he’s been shot. Later, when the event is over, Fidel and Dwayne receive a call rerouted from the police switchboard.
Carlton seems to be disturbed by something at the gallery and leaves abruptly. There are also three women who we don’t get much information about, but who are clearly going to be implicated.
The gallery owner gives some information about the painting and its artist before we’re introduced to this week’s cast of suspects and victims: there’s Carlton, a male escort who seems to be a friend of Fidel’s. The setup: Regular characters Fidel and Dwayne are moonlighting as security guards at a gallery a painting by one of the island’s prominent early 20th century artists is on display before being auctioned. But obviously there are going to be spoilers for the episode. Details are going to be a bit fuzzy, because I can’t go back to check them. Not to show off, but because I think there are certain sorts of clues that really stand out, especially in dialogue, and clients are often interested in techniques for making this kind of information less (and occasionally more) prominent. While I’m waiting for it to come back online, I’m going to make a prediction about whodunit. The internet has cut out, just over a fifth (12m 15s) of the way into this week’s episode of Death in Paradise.